When the news broke that Amazon had paid just $20 million to secure full creative control over the James Bond franchise, the internet collectively raised an eyebrow. 
How could one of cinema’s most lucrative brands – spanning six decades, 25 films, and generations of suave secret agents – be priced below what Daniel Craig reportedly earned for a single movie? The answer, as it turns out, is both more complicated and far more interesting than the headline suggests.
The figure comes from a U.K. tax filing by EON Productions, the family-run company behind Bond since the 1960s. In February 2025, Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson sold their company’s interests in the franchise to Amazon, transferring ownership of its subsidiaries, B24 and B25 Limited, for that modest sum. Yet, according to industry insiders, this $20 million represents only the tip of a much larger iceberg.
As The Hollywood Reporter notes, Broccoli and Wilson didn’t simply walk away. Their agreement reportedly allows them to retain significant financial exposure through a joint venture model – meaning they’ll continue to profit from Bond’s future success. Add in potential stock options, backend earnouts, and performance incentives, and the final value could soar closer to $1 billion. In short: Amazon didn’t just buy Bond; it bought into a partnership steeped in legacy, creative power, and shared risk.
This deal also folds neatly into Amazon’s earlier $8.45 billion acquisition of MGM Studios, which already granted it access to much of the Bond library. The additional $20 million appears to have tied up loose ends, giving Amazon total creative control over one of Hollywood’s most enduring IPs. That move positions the tech giant not only as a streaming powerhouse but also as a direct competitor to major studios like Disney and Warner Bros. Discovery.
Currently, Amazon MGM Studios is fast-tracking the 26th Bond film, with acclaimed director Denis Villeneuve reportedly in talks to helm the project. Screenwriter Steven Knight (of Peaky Blinders) is crafting the script, while producers David Heyman and Amy Pascal are attached to bring fresh life to the world’s most famous spy. Insiders claim the studio is searching for a younger, relatively unknown British actor – late 20s to early 30s – to carry the tuxedo into a new generation.
Beyond the financial intrigue, the sale reflects a broader transformation of cinematic ownership in the streaming era. Legacy franchises are now traded not only for money but for influence, exclusivity, and brand identity. Whether this shift will reinvigorate Bond or strip him of his classic charm remains to be seen – but one thing’s certain: the spy who loved profit will live to stream another day.
1 comment
20 million for Bond?? that’s like buying a 2 bedroom flat and getting a tuxedo for free